A-level results 2020: ‘Enough is enough’ says heads’ union as it demands government review

Geoff Barton

The government must urgently review the system used to award A-level grades to pupils this year, the Association of School and College Leaders has said.

ASCL general secretary Geoff Barton said his organisation had received “heartbreaking feedback” from school leaders, who had seen grades pulled down “in a way that they feel to be utterly unfair and unfathomable”.

We have done everything we possibly can to support the grading process in difficult circumstances, but there is a time to say enough is enough

Students across England are receiving their A-level results today, with headteachers reporting a huge upset as a result of the standardisation of centre-assessment grades. Ofqual, the exams regulator, said today that almost 40 per cent of grades were downgraded, with some lowered by as many as three grades.

Exam boards reported that the proportion of top grades issued has risen by 2.4 percentage points this year, despite the disruption.

But Barton said he was “very concerned that this disguises a great deal of volatility among the results at school and student level”.

“We have received heartbreaking feedback from school leaders about grades being pulled down in a way that they feel to be utterly unfair and unfathomable. They are extremely concerned about the detrimental impact on their students.

“They worked very hard to provide accurate grades to the exam boards, carefully following all the guidance, and are dismayed that the statistical model then used to standardise these grades has had such a devastating impact. This is in terms of both the number of grades lowered, and some students’ results being pulled down by more than one grade.”

Barton said ASCL would be “working to understand more about what has happened”, but that its “immediate impression is that the statistical process has proved to be far too blunt an instrument and has created clear injustices”.

“We have always accepted that some form of standardisation was needed to provide consistency, and we recognise that this was never going to be easy. But the education system is not a statistical model, it is a collection of individuals, and we fear the process has lacked this important degree of nuance.

“We are now calling on the government and the exam regulator Ofqual to review the situation as a matter of urgency, and we would warn them against simply digging in their heels, and insisting all is well.”

He added that it was “not sufficient” for the government dismiss these concerns “by saying that schools and colleges can attempt to battle their way through the appeals process, or that students who are not satisfied can enter the autumn exam series some seven to eight months after they finished their courses, and are no longer at the centre where they studied”.

“We have done everything we possibly can to support the grading process in difficult circumstances, but there is a time to say enough is enough.”

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


  1. Carolyn Luke

    It’s a disgrace!

    Can someone please explain how a student with predicated grades of A*, A & B be downgraded by the collage to A, B, B then downgraded again to A, C, C, not only eliminating my son’s chances of a place at Warwick to study Cyber Security but also potentially loosing a sponsorship connected to the course, which he worked extremely hard to get,?

    This is a complete and utter shambles and something needs to be done urgently to help all those students who are being extremely unfairly treated.

    Our government are a complete disgrace and should be ousted for this complete carnage.

    • Philip Wayne

      ASCL has been superb throughout the whole of the pandemic situation. The organisation is adept at navigating the political world as well as challenging Government in a rationale and reasonable way-just as the profession should be represented.

    • Janet Ridgway

      My grandson received his AS results. Predicted 2A’s and a B/C. Actual results BCD. It seems so unfair. I agree with all you say. These hardworking youngsters are individuals not a statistic. He lives in Wales so hope you will fight for them too

  2. MD Shamirul

    As no exam was possible so all grading system must follow some transparent standardized formula, ok plus if consider progressive, retrogressive or parallel to add even! In that case anybody can even calculate his grade with very little chancees of errors! Better publish the formula and any lower grade must reverse to his real as from the past records if to justice. Higher grades students also suffer as got same number by all near caliber ones.

  3. Fran Perry

    It is heartbreaking indeed for so many students (mostly!) but also for teachers who the government appear to completely disregard – implying bias and suggesting some have been unprofessional in their judgements. Teachers pay the unions a lot of money every year and we absolutely need the union leaders to set right this injustice for the sake of all involved.

  4. Geoff Barton says: “We have done everything we possibly can to support the grading process in difficult circumstances, but there is a time to say enough is enough.”

    One thing Geoff did to “support the grading process” was lobby Ofqual to ensure that exam entries from external candidates (home-educated children, resitters, etc.) were withdrawn so that those candidates would receive no grades at all.