Assessment

Year 8 reading test plan splits teachers and heads

More teachers back government plan than oppose it, but leaders are far more sceptical

More teachers back government plan than oppose it, but leaders are far more sceptical

More teachers back government plans for a mandatory reading test in year 8 than oppose it – but leaders are more sceptical, new polling shows.

Schools Week revealed last week that the government is planning to use its schools white paper later this term to introduce the check.

It would be the first statutory test in key stage 3 since SATs for year 9s were scrapped in 2008.

The policy has been prompted by concerns that poor reading is holding pupils back from accessing the curriculum in other subjects at secondary school.

A Teacher Tapp poll has found 16 per cent would “strongly support” the introduction of such a test, with a further 24 per cent “slightly” supporting the policy.

Thirty-six per cent said they neither supported nor opposed it. Nine per cent slightly opposed it, while 15 per cent were strongly opposed.

Under the plans, the test results would be available to the government and Ofsted, but would only be published at a national level – similar to the year 1 phonics check.

They would not be used to trigger intervention in schools, sources said.

Phillipson defends plans

But Teacher Tapp found headteachers were more likely to oppose a year 8 reading test (39 per cent) than other senior leaders (27 per cent), middle leaders (22 per cent) and classroom teachers (23 per cent).

The pollster said this showed “fears that a new test would be used as a school accountability measure”, something unions have also raised.

But speaking at the Labour Party conference at the weekend, Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary, defended the proposal.

“It is important, particularly for working-class kids, that we have a sense not just of where they are but where we need to step in and put more support in place…”

“Of course, I want to make sure that our staff are well supported, but my number one priority is making sure that all children leave school well prepared for the world to come.”

Reactions from school leaders have been mixed. The ASCL leaders’ union has said if “done well”, the test “could be helpful”, but warned school leaders “may well be uneasy about what future governments might do”.

The NAHT union, on the other hand, has said the test would be “unnecessary, distracting and not a good use of money”.

‘We didn’t teach them to read. That’s on all of us’

Dan Morrow, the chief executive of the Cornwall Education Learning Trust, told the Labour conference he was “in favour” of the tests.

“Most of our children are sitting reading tests, left, right and centre, and we’re paying a lot of money for them.

“My worry about the check is that we react professionally, as sometimes we do, which is we teach to a test…That’s on us, frankly, because that’s not what the check is.

“As a primary leader, I would say this very honestly, sometimes we nurture and hold our primary children so well, then we say, ‘oh, but what happens when we get to secondary?’

Annamarie Hassall
Annamarie Hassall

“What happens is we didn’t teach them to read, and so they can’t actually access that curriculum. And that’s probably not the secondary leaders. That’s on all of us.”

Annamarie Hassall, the chief executive of the National Association for Special Educational Needs, told the same panel event at the conference that the idea of year 8 checks had come up in her discussions with the government’s curriculum and assessment review.

“We did talk about measurements, and one of our proposed measurements was reading. We have a worry that sometimes there’s a view that reading is the job of primary phase, and in secondary that job should have been done elsewhere.”

Different approaches to progress testing

Teacher Tapp’s polling shows schools take different approaches to internal testing during key stages 2 and 3.

Asked how they currently assessed whether pupils in their subject were on track at the end of key stage 3, 59 per cent said they used end of topic tests they wrote themselves, while 37 per cent said they relied on teachers’ judgment.

Just 11 per cent said they bought in tests.

But asked for the primary method they used to check reading progress during key stage 2, 43 per cent said they used standardised tests from external providers, while 27 per cent said they used past SATs papers and 24 per cent said their school provided its own tests.

Latest education roles from

Chief Financial Officer

Chief Financial Officer

Minerva Learning Trust

Head of Programme 2D Studies – City Lit

Head of Programme 2D Studies – City Lit

FEA

Group Director of Governance & Company Secretary

Group Director of Governance & Company Secretary

New City College

Principal (Harrow College) – HRUC

Principal (Harrow College) – HRUC

FEA

Sponsored posts

Sponsored post

Helping every learner use AI responsibly

AI didn’t wait to be invited into the classroom. It burst in mid-lesson. Across UK schools, pupils are already...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

Retire Early, Live Fully: What Teachers Need to Consider First

Specialist Financial Adviser, William Adams, from Wesleyan Financial Services discusses what teachers should be considering when it comes to...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

AI Safety: From DfE Guidance to Classroom Confidence

Darren Coxon, edtech consultant and AI education specialist, working with The National College, explores the DfE’s expectations for AI...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

How accurate spend information is helping schools identify savings

One the biggest issues schools face when it comes to saving money on everyday purchases is a lack of...

SWAdvertorial

More from this theme

Assessment

Year 8s to sit mandatory reading test under white paper plans

Move to ensure poorer pupils are not shut off from wider curriculum, but results will be published at national...

Freddie Whittaker
Assessment

Rise in pupils hitting top marks in times tables tests

Attainment rises in Year 4 maths assessment - as EHCP gap widens slightly

Jack Dyson

The Future of Assessment

A free FE Week and Schools Week supplement in partnership with NCFE, diving into assessment reform

Find out more

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *