Special schools demand clarity on vulnerability criteria amid closure warning

summer schools

Special schools could be at risk of closing completely if government guidance on vulnerable children is not updated urgently, sector leaders are warning.

The Department for Education has confirmed to Schools Week that special and alternative provision schools will be closed to all but vulnerable and key worker children.

However, any child with an education health and care plan (EHCP) is deemed as vulnerable and able to attend school during lockdown – which accounts for nearly 98 per cent of special school populations, according to the latest statistics.

Simon Knight, joint head teacher at Frank Wise School in Oxfordshire, said running full classrooms risks “increasing numbers of staff may choose to invoke section 44 notices, which could lead to chaotic school closures and ultimately more children unable to access on site learning”.

Section 44 of the employment rights act 1996 states that employees have the right “not to be subjected to any detriment” if they leave or refuse to return to work because they believe it is dangerous.

The government has yet to publish updated schools guidance on the latest lockdown, but its current list of those who can go to school states only children of critical workers or vulnerable children “should” attend school.

SEND Action, a campaign network of families, individuals and organisations, has put a call out for parents of children with an EHCP, who are not able to attend school, to share their stories.

One parent said that a special school is only allowing the “most” vulnerable back into school. “No discussion with parents at all,” the parent added.

SEND Action responded to one tweet with: “Children with EHCPs should be able to attend but lack of support/guidance for special schools seems to be preventing this in some cases.”

Knight added the sector urgently needs “more clarity” on how to determine who within schools “has the greatest need” or face staff invoking their legal rights on working in an unsafe environment.

Adam Boddison, chief executive of SEN organisation Nasen, said his plea was to “let professionals locally” who know the children and families make professional determination of who to support and add “most vulnerable” to the guidance.

“Part of the issue is there’s confusion as well, different school leaders are actually interpreting it in different ways, parents are interpreting in different ways.

He added: “The problem that government has got is how do they balance the two competing priorities of the legal right to education that is enshrined within the Children and Families Act for EHCPs with the teachers rights to have a safe working environment and those two things butt right up against each other because of the wider situation.

“Ironically, the solution to this is where possible, to give remote education as actually for some children that will work as well if not better and that’s the flexibility that isn’t there at the moment.”

There has been confusion today about the situation at special schools and alternative provision.

The Prime Minister failed to mention the two types of schools in his announcement yesterday, only referring to primary and secondary schools, colleges and early years settings and that those who are clinically extremely vulnerable should shield again.

An email sent to heads last night after the broadcast said that AP and special schools would be open to vulnerable and the children of key workers.

But a tweet sent out by the DfE this morning said that “early years, nurseries, alternative provision and special schools will remain open”.

The DfE has finally confirmed to Schools Week this afternoon that AP and special schools will in fact be only open to vulnerable pupils.

Knight, also national SEND Leader at Whole School SEND, added: “Once again Government has acted without due regard to the specialist sector, those who work within it, but most importantly the children who attend and their families.

“This failure of leadership, and an apparent unwillingness by Government to consider the unique characteristics of the sector and those it educates, has left schools scrabbling to work out how best to serve their communities safely.”

Special schools were told last week they had flexibility to get mass testing organised – meaning they did not have to fully open until the second week of term.

The guidance, published last week, said that schools had the option of agreeing with parents that individual pupils can stay at home, but the aim should be that all pupils in special schools and AP are back on or after January 11.

Leaders are now in the dark over whether this flexibility still applies this week, or they have to welcome back all vulnerable pupils

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


  1. Dominic Wall

    I am also a serving headteacher in a special school and I completely agree with my colleague Simon’s comments; the government has failed to learn any of the lessons of previous rounds and once again ‘bounced’ special schools into avoidable conflict with rightly frustrated parents.
    We cannot give any clarity to already stressed families, and staff members, whilst we have a duty of care to both constituencies.
    This was not good enough the first time in March 2020, to do it again nine months later is inexcusable.

  2. Jackie Perrin

    School staff should be vaccinated immediately. No one else in any other environment have to be unprotected in a room containing many people. I have a number of family members, working in the teaching profession including my twin … and it is so scary and wrong.

  3. Sue Brown

    Why are we different to secondary and primary schools? Our students may have EHCPs but that doesn’t mean that they should have to attend school or that as staff we are any less vulnerable. At my school the students are actually more medically vulnerable than children at mainstream schools but we are still supposed to be in school. How ridiculous to lump us all together. Special means specialist – we are all different, why are we still open?

  4. Ana Ramos

    I think All children with disabilitiesthat cannot cope in staying home should be offered a place at school if they can’t there should be another provision for other children to go to.
    I am lucky my son has a place as a keyworker and I couldn’t cope with 24 hours a day at home I struggle in holidays but have some respite for him.