Rebrokered academies given 3-year Ofsted grace period


Rebrokered academies will be classed as “new schools” and entitled to a three-year grace period from Ofsted inspectors.

The watchdog announced in October last year that initial inspections for new schools that opened from September 2014, including converter academies, would be put back from their second to third year of operation.

But the three-year period has now been extended to academies rebrokered from failing trusts. Prior inspections and results will be discarded.
It comes as the government finds itself under pressure to find suitable sponsors for the increasing number of rebrokered schools.

Academy bosses have welcomed the plans. Toby Salt (pictured), chief executive of Ormiston Academies Trust, said: “Academy transformation doesn’t happen overnight, so giving rebrokered academies a longer period to put in place the foundations for sustainable improvement could have positive outcomes.”

Sir Steve Lancashire, chief executive of REAch2, added: “It goes without saying that the transfer must be to a trust that will provide a safe pair of hands, and that during the three years, regional school commissioners provide close monitoring and scrutiny.

“We should also expect the transferring academy to be at least good by the time Ofsted inspect at the three-year point.”

The education watchdog previously visited new schools in their second year, normally from the fifth term onwards.

Schools originally classed as new by Ofsted included free schools, sponsored and converter academies, school amalgamations, mergers, university technical colleges and studio schools.

But an updated version of the Ofsted handbook, published this month, reveals that rebrokered schools will also fall under the “new” category.

Janet Downs, from the Local Schools Network, said she was “concerned” the changes would hide the history of predecessor schools, making it “difficult to follow a school’s history”.

She added: “It will then be difficult to counter claims of ‘improvement’ by the chain that took over the academy if it’s impossible to find information about the predecessor schools. Even the Ofsted reports could disappear from Ofsted’s website.”

Alasdair Smith, national secretary of the Anti-Academies Alliance, said the change was a “disgraceful move” that shot down ministers’ claims the academies revolution enabled swift intervention.

What it is saying to the children in those schools is ‘it doesn’t matter, your schools doesn’t have to improve as quickly as others’

“I’m suspicious about this because I think it has come from pressure from the academy sponsors themselves. Evidence shows that they are very poor at turning around failing schools.

“What it is saying to the children in those schools is ‘it doesn’t matter, your schools doesn’t have to improve as quickly as others’. I can’t understand why the government would take that position, you would think that would be the other way round.”

However, Ofsted has said the chief inspector does retain the power to inspect earlier if there are concerns about the school, or when requested by the secretary of state.

Ofsted’s updated handbook also confirms academies judged to have “serious weaknesses” that are not rebrokered, will be subject to monitoring visits within 18 months.

Academies judged to require special measures, which are not rebrokered, will be inspected no later than 24 months after the special measures inspection.

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


  1. The DfE has been inconsistent on this rule. For example, Hockwold Primary School and Methwold High School in Norfolk amalgamated in September 2011. As a new school it should have had a two year grace. However, barely a term later, in February 2012, inspectors arrived and judged it Inadequate. Governors decided to jump’ into academy conversion before it was pushed.

    • Mark Watson

      So are you saying that the school (which was judged to have been Inadequate when inspected) should have been allowed to carry on its merry way continuing to get worse and worse?
      It seems clear to me from the article above that the default policy is to allow schools a grace period, but during this time there will be a close watch kept on them and if they seem to be failing then action will be taken.