Rayner: Labour has ‘will and vision’ to improve education

Labour has the “political will and vision” to make England’s education system “the envy of the world”, the shadow education secretary Angela Rayner has said today, but school leaders must wait to hear the party’s official policies.

The former care worker and union rep admitted the need to develop “coherent” policies had given her “sleepless nights” since her appointment as shadow education secretary last July.

Rayner received a warm reception at the Association of School and College Leaders annual conference in Birmingham this afternoon, where she attacked plans for new grammar schools and called for money allocated for free schools to be spent “more fairly”.

I am not going to write Labour’s education manifesto today

The Ashton-under-Lyne MP said she understood that many in the schools community were “looking to Labour for a lead” and want to know what the party would do in government, but said she was not prepared to pre-empt manifesto commitments.

“I hope you will understand that I am not going to write Labour’s education manifesto today, three years ahead of the likely general election date.”

The lack of specific policies on education from the opposition is a growing source of frustration among party supporters in the sector and the population more widely.

Mike Kane, the shadow schools minister, has spoken of the need for schools to be more accountable for parents and for England’s schools commissioners to cover smaller areas and work with city mayors.

The most substantial policy to have been announced by the Labour Party since Corbyn’s election to the leadership a year and a half ago is what he dubs the “national education service”, but very few details about the policy or how it will be implemented have since emerged. He has also pledged an arts pupil premium.

READ MORE: Labour admits ‘no policy’ on academies

Rayner said today that she “truly believes” in Corbyn’s flagship national education service policy, and says England needs “a cradle-to-grave lifelong learning policy, especially if we are going to give people skills and build an economy that’s fit for the future”.

She added that her priority area for additional spending on education would be the early years, rather than schools, but hinted that she would reverse recent policies on selection and spending on free schools if she ran the Department for Education.

Rayner also criticised the government over teacher workload, and raised the case of a school in Rochdale which was criticised by a coroner for adding to the stress of a teacher who went on to kill herself last year.

She also provoked laughter and applause when she rubbished claims from the government that it plans to make teaching more “flexible”.

Justine Greening, the education secretary, spoke about the need for a “cultural shift” towards flexible working in schools, claiming it was part of the solution to ongoing problems with teacher recruitment and retention.

Justine Greening

“I was interested in some of the comments that Justine made yesterday about work-life balance, and I nearly spat my coffee out,” Rayner said, branding Greening “out of touch” with what is happening in schools for believing that flexible working could be introduced in the current system

She blamed the “obsession with paperwork, the obsession with teaching to a test” for some of the workload issues faced by staff, and said school leaders often had the solutions, but needed more support.

“There are no teachers or teaching leaders who go into the classroom and think ‘I’ll do a mediocre job today’,” she said.

“Nobody goes into that profession and thinks they’re doing it for the money either, it would be ridiculous. And you certainly don’t do it for the wealth and the love of your family, because your family often sacrifice a lot for you to be working all the hours you give.”

Greening, who was heckled by leaders over grammar schools, yesterday branded the lack of flexible working opportunities in schools a “massive missed opportunity”, and pledged to hold a summit on the issue later in the year.

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply to Opal Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.


  1. Without inspiational degree-trained subject teachers there can be no decent schooling in our State Education System. What possible good can come of fragmenting a system to breaking point, especially with years of austerity behind us, and probably years to come? Why the heck are student teachers required to take out a tuition fee loan anyway, or nurses for that matter – the bedrock of our state-funded infrastructure. That’s why we pay our taxes. I don’t want education on the cheap, cutting corners, for my children. Parents and class/subject teachers must unite and say no to bullying politicians, no to pie-in-the-sky performance measures, no to ruining our children’s mental health, and no to fragmentation of our state schools. In my day, we were taught, we worked hard, we thought freely, and we thrived in certain subjects which throught hard work and motivation go on to carve out a career for ourselves. Malala says it all in her speech – “support young people to believe in themselves”- not teach to a test or flight target. Just teach and love to learn.

  2. M Critic

    The Labour Party during the Blair/Brown years (1997-2010) ruined education down to the point that some pupils who barely pass their GCSEs still struggle to read and write, thus making it difficult for them to find employment. Furthermore those GCSEs and A Levels were consistently dumbed-down.

    The Labour Party also introduced soft subjects (e.g. GNVQs and NVQs) as a tool to push everyone into mediocre universities and encourage them to take further soft subjects (e.g. Media Studies). They were the ones who also introduced tuition fees in 1998 (starting at £1000).

    The Labour Party also encourage lack of discipline, lack of compassion for front-line teachers who are constantly under pressure with excessive workload and dealing with troubled pupils and their feckless parents. It’s no wonder why many teachers have left the profession or have taken teaching positions overseas where the teaching environment is likely to be less toxic, unlike the UK.

    Labour have also caused concerned parents to send their kids to private schools, grammar schools or personally have them home-educated rather than leaving them in bog-standard bureaucratic comprehensive schools, where classroom sizes are too big.