Curriculum review

Progress 8: A third of pupils’ GCSE entries don’t fit reformed measure

Changes will make 'little difference' to scores but likely to affect qualification entries, finds Datalab analysis

Changes will make 'little difference' to scores but likely to affect qualification entries, finds Datalab analysis

Proposed changes to league tables will make “little difference” to the progress 8 and attainment 8 scores of most schools, but will likely affect GCSE entries, with just 65 per cent of current students filling all slots on the reformed measures, analysis suggests.

FFT Education Datalab has analysed the impact proposed changes to league tables will have, based on entries and outcomes for pupils who say their GCSEs last year.

At present, schools are given a progress score based on pupils’ improvement since primary school in eight subject “buckets”.

The first two are English and maths, and three more have to be EBacc subjects – including sciences, languages or humanities. The remaining three are “open” buckets for any other qualifications.

Under the government’s proposal, English and maths will remain the first two buckets, but two buckets will be created specifically for science qualifications, including double science, the separate sciences and computing.

The remaining four would be new “breadth” buckets, and these would have to include a subject from two of the three categories of humanities, creative subjects and language.

‘Little difference’ to scores

Datalab’s analysis found that if applying the new rules to last year’s results, 92 per cent of schools “ended up with a revised score within 0.1 points of their existing score”.

Six per cent of schools would have a progress 8 score between 0.1 and 0.2 points below their previous score, and just 1 per cent would have a score over 0.2 points lower.

The effect on attainment 8 scores was also minimal, the analysis found.

The national average score for state-funded mainstream schools “would have fallen by 1 point from 46.9 to 45.9 had the new method been used in 2024”.

Thirty-six per cent of pupils would have had a lower attainment 8 score if the new methodology had been used last year.

For 7 per cent, the difference would have been 5 or more points lower. Around 2 per cent would have achieved a higher score.

1 in 3 pupils’ entries not compliant

However, the changes are “likely to have more of an impact on the qualifications for which pupils are entered”.

Datalab found that just 65 per cent of pupils in 2024 entered qualifications that would have filled all 10 slots of the new league tables measures (English and maths are double-weighted).

This was “largely due to having insufficient entries to fill group 4, the slots reserved for 2 subjects from humanities, creative subjects and languages”. 

This was “particularly the case for disadvantaged pupils. Fifty-four per cent filled all 10 slots.”

Overall, 33 per cent of pupils do not fill their group 4 slots.

Six per cent of pupils had no entries in any of the three categories of subject. Twenty-three per cent were only entered for a humanities subject, 3 per cent only for a creative subject and 1 per cent just for a language.

The new measures will class religious studies as a humanities subject for the first time. Datalab said 88 per cent of pupils entered at least one humanities subject based on the new definition in 2024.

Overall, 35 per cent of pupils currently enter two or more humanities subjects. This is because “many students currently take geography or history to count alongside double science in order to fill the EBacc slots.

“There is a risk that entries will fall as a result of the less restrictive new methodology.”

‘A shift back to GCSE’

The government has also said that vocational and technical qualifications won’t count in group 4 under the new measures. For example, a technical award in performing arts won’t count as a pupil’s creative subject.

Dave Thomson, who ran the analysis for Datalab, said this was “likely to result in a shift back to GCSE.

“Secondly, the incentives to enter pupils for geography or history have been reduced.

“What we will see is an increase in the percentage of pupils filling their ‘group 4’ slots. This will mean taking either a creative subject or a language.

“Given the harsher grading of languages, I suspect that we will see more of an increase in entries in the creative subjects.”

Latest education roles from

Director of Finance

Director of Finance

Inspire Learning Partnership

Lead Practitioner in Maths

Lead Practitioner in Maths

Bolton College

Head of Apprenticeship Quality

Head of Apprenticeship Quality

Manchester Metropolitan University

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Executive Officer

Brooke Weston Trust

Sponsored posts

Sponsored post

Six tips for improving teaching and learning for vocabulary and maths

The more targeted the learning activity to a student’s ability level, the more impactful it will be.

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

From lesson plans to financial plans: Helping teachers prepare for the Autumn budget and beyond

Specialist Financial Adviser, William Adams, from Wesleyan Financial Services explains why financial planning will be key to preparing for...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

IncludEd Conference: Get Inclusion Ready

As we all clamber to make sense of the new Ofsted framework, it can be hard to know where...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

Helping every learner use AI responsibly

AI didn’t wait to be invited into the classroom. It burst in mid-lesson. Across UK schools, pupils are already...

SWAdvertorial

More from this theme

Curriculum review

Ministers will put RE on national curriculum – but sector must ‘reach consensus’

Government to set up taskforce to oversee the change, but only if sector reaches 'consensus on whether this is...

Ruth Lucas
Curriculum review

DfE ignores Francis review and proposes sweeping progress 8 reform

Government pledges reforms to subject make-up of key secondary school league table measure - despite curriculum review calling for...

Freddie Whittaker
Curriculum review

Curriculum review: All the key policy recommendations

Scrap EBacc, year 8 tests in English and maths, cut 10% from GCSE exam time: key system policies from...

Freddie Whittaker
Curriculum review

Curriculum review: The subject-specific policy proposals

Mandatory citizenship, RE in the national curriculum and triple science entitlement: the key subject recommendations from the Francis review

Freddie Whittaker

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *