Academies

Lilac Sky: 8 years, 2 banned heads, £3m ‘improper’ spending – but no report 

The government had promised for years to publish its investigation report into a scandal-hit trust

The government had promised for years to publish its investigation report into a scandal-hit trust

Exclusive

After an eight-year investigation that allegedly uncovered £3 million of “improper” academy trust spending and led to the banning of two heads, the government has bizarrely claimed an investigation report into the scandal “does not exist”.

The Department for Education has for years promised to publish its investigation report into the collapse of the Lilac Sky Schools Trust.

An “outcome” report was published online this year.

While it alleged more than £3 million of trust spending was deemed “contentious, irregular or improper”, it had few further details.  

The government previously dodged releasing the investigation under the freedom of information process, saying it “intended to publish the final report once the investigation had concluded”.

But after a new FOI from Schools Week, the DfE has now claimed: “A final investigation report does not exist.”

Holly Lawton, the deputy director for counter fraud and prevention at the Education and Skills Funding Agency, said the previous report was an “interim paper intended to support the investigation process”.

“The nature of the information contained within the paper was unverified and therefore incomplete.”

Andy Jolley
Andy Jolley

When asked for clarity on the meaning of “unverified”, the DfE said this “does not mean that the information or evidence gathered by the investigation is inaccurate”.

Instead, it means the Maxwellisation process – where all parties named in the report have a chance to respond – has not been completed. 

Transparency campaigner Andy Jolley said: “It’s nonsense officials haven’t received a final report, they are using semantics to protect people from scrutiny.”

Laura McInerney, an FOI expert, said there were 23 reasons the government could give to not provide information. 

“They can’t just now claim a report they said existed has disappeared. They should follow the rules, just like schools are expected to do.” 

Latest education roles from

Executive Director of Finance – Moulton College

Executive Director of Finance – Moulton College

FEA

Director of Governance – HRUC

Director of Governance – HRUC

FEA

Principal and CEO

Principal and CEO

Hills Road Sixth Form College

Senior Quality Officer

Senior Quality Officer

University of Lancashire

Sponsored posts

Sponsored post

IncludEd Conference: Get Inclusion Ready

As we all clamber to make sense of the new Ofsted framework, it can be hard to know where...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

Helping every learner use AI responsibly

AI didn’t wait to be invited into the classroom. It burst in mid-lesson. Across UK schools, pupils are already...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

Retire Early, Live Fully: What Teachers Need to Consider First

Specialist Financial Adviser, William Adams, from Wesleyan Financial Services discusses what teachers should be considering when it comes to...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

AI Safety: From DfE Guidance to Classroom Confidence

Darren Coxon, edtech consultant and AI education specialist, working with The National College, explores the DfE’s expectations for AI...

SWAdvertorial

More from this theme

Academies

Free schools update ‘later this year’, and 3 other things we learned from ministers

The education secretary and her team answered MPs' questions in Parliament today

Jack Dyson
Academies

More standalone schools on the brink as deficits grow

Seventy-five trusts – one with a deficit of almost £6 million – raised concerns about their ability to continue...

Jack Dyson
Academies

Specialist MAT given notice to improve after seeking bailout

12-school trust said it had to ask for 'emergency' government cash after 'significant delays' to SEND and free school...

Jack Dyson
Academies

Officials kept mum about academy probe as merger decided

Revelation reopens debate around the transparency of important academy decisions

Jack Dyson

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *