News

Just 18% of teachers say Ofsted is ‘trusted and reliable’



Fewer than one in five teachers now believe Ofsted is a “reliable and trusted” judge of school standards after confidence in the watchdog plunged this year.

The annual teachers’ survey, which quizzed over 1,000 teachers on their awareness and perceptions of Ofsted, was published today.

It found just 18 per cent of teachers agreed Ofsted acts as a reliable and trusted arbiter of schools, with 55 per cent disagreeing. This is also a huge drop on last year, when 35 per cent said Ofsted acts as a reliable and trusted arbiter, with only 51 per cent disagreeing.

Teachers who have been recently inspected were less likely to disagree with the statement than those who were inspected one to two years ago.

Another area that has seen a huge drop in confidence among teachers is that Ofsted acts independently of government. Just 19 per cent of teachers agreed with this statement this year, compared to 30 per cent of teachers in 2018.

The findings are likely to be a big blow to the inspectorate as it prepares to introduce a new framework this September.

There has also been a big decrease in agreement that inspections are important and necessary to monitor performance and hold schools to account. Just 38 per cent respondents agreed with this statement, compared to 50 per cent last year.

The proportion of teachers who regard the inspectorate as a force for improvement in education has also slumped, from 24 per cent agreeing and 49 per cent disagreeing last year to 20 per cent agreeing and 56 per cent disagreeing this year. Just 27 per cent said inspections help individual schools improve, compared with 31 per cent last year.

Like last year, half of all teachers said that Ofsted inspections mean doing extra and unnecessary work. However, the proportion of teachers who felt the final judgement reached by Ofsted was fair and accurate has also remained stable at 61 per cent.

Seven in 10 said their last inspection was pretty much in line with what was expected, while half (52 per cent) said the inspection team was ‘professional but detached’.

A spokesperson for Ofsted said it had received a lot of “positive feedback” on its new inspection framework and is “looking forward to seeing how the new inspections are received by school staff from September.”

“We know from this survey that teachers who have been inspected more recently tend to be more positive, and we hope that trend continues under the new inspections.”



Your thoughts

Leave a Reply to Roger Titcombe Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2 Comments

  1. Nothing new here. OfSTED has always been biased against schools with low ability intakes, which have been seen as fodder ripe for Academisation, while ‘outstanding schools’ have been allowed to exploit their status for decades without inspection, even though the few that are, are frequently found to be dire See

    https://rogertitcombelearningmatters.wordpress.com/2018/07/10/ofsted-and-outstanding-schools-are-harming-national-educational-attainment/

    • Mark Watson

      Hmmmm, I’m seeing something of a double standard here.

      “OfSTED has always been biased against schools with low ability intakes, which have been seen as fodder ripe for Academisation, while ‘outstanding schools’ have been allowed to exploit their status for decades without inspection, even though the few that are, are frequently found to be dire.”

      Sounds like you don’t have much time or regard for Ofsted then. Which is curious, when just four days before the above comment you seemed to have a somewhat different view:

      “In my school that served a a poor inner urban community of a northern town we replaced a former punishment-driven regime and in the process achieved a co-operative learning culture and no exclusions, fixed term or permanent, that was recognised as outstanding in successive OfSTED inspections.”

      So it seems that when Ofsted judged your school as Outstanding this was something to be proud of and clearly meant something.

      Doesn’t seem like they were biased against “schools with low ability intakes” when it came to your “poor inner urban community” does it?