News

EXCLUSIVE: Baseline assessments could be scrapped over comparability concerns



A multi-million pound policy piloted in thousands of primary schools this year could be scrapped over concerns regarding its comparability.

A study, commissioned by the Department for Education (DfE), is understood to have found that tests from the three chosen providers for baseline assessments of reception children cannot easily be compared – putting the policy’s future in doubt.

Under the controversial baseline assessment scheme, primary schools must, from September, use the tests if they want to be assessed on pupil progress at key stage 2 (KS2), as opposed to pupil attainment.

Three approved baseline assessment providers – Early Excellence, Durham University’s Centre for Evaluation and Monitoring (CEM) and the National Foundation for Educational Research (NFER) – began rolling out their assessments at the start of this academic year.

The Standards and Testing Agency ordered a study late last year to check the “robustness” of the assessments by each provider.

If the assessments are not adequately comparable, the progress of pupils in each school cannot be compared against each other on a national scale, putting paid to planned performance measures expected to be used to highlight underperforming schools.

Government officials would not confirm the content of the study but stated its results would be published “in due course”.

A mooted alternative to baseline test is the introduction of “school readiness” checks – an option said to be preferred by No 10. Such checks assess children’s ability to hold pencils or read basic words and have been widely debated in the US.

Schools Week understands the DfE, as well as Downing Street, is keen to explore how early years providers can make sure children are “school ready” when starting reception.

The prime minister’s office was approached for official comment but did not respond.

In an email sent to providers and seen by Schools Week, the department said the extension of the baseline assessments was dependent on the outcome of the report and a decision by ministers.

It added: “Our expectation was that a final decision would be taken towards the end of January. However… we are still awaiting our ministers’ decision.”

Schools Week understands the study, which was carried out by the Scottish Qualifications Authority, will be released within the next month.

The email warns providers that any costs incurred in preparation for the 2016/17 academic year are “undertaken at [their] own risk” and the department “will not accept any liability for any costs [the providers] may incur as a result of this work” should their contracts not be extended.

Early Excellence said it would not speculate before the report’s publication. NFER would also not be drawn on its position if the report finds the tests are incomparable.

CEM director Rob Coe said: “It is a bit of a mess isn’t it? The problem is that if they do find the tests to be incompatible and if they find the comparability hasn’t worked out, where does that leave the policy? I’m not quite sure.”

He said CEM was happy with its tests and given all providers had met DfE criteria there ought to be reasonable compatibility and comparability between providers, adding: “If that hasn’t happened, I guess something has gone wrong somewhere.”

Baseline assessments had a troubled start. Before its introduction, 80 signatories, including children’s author Philip Pullman, urged the government to scrap the tests.

In July, a report published by the DfE and written by NFER said there was “some evidence” to suggest schools might game the assessments. Schools with lower results at the baseline could, in theory, show more progress by the end of KS2.

In November, problems arose when “anomalies” were discovered in Early Excellence’s literacy scores.

This month, a survey of 1,000 teachers by the UCL Institute of Education found 60 per cent did not think the tests accurately reflected child attainment and the tests were dubbed “inaccurate, invalid and unreliable” by teacher unions.

Schools taking part in baseline tests have costs reimbursed by the DfE.

Early Excellence was chosen by more than 12,000 schools. Its tests cost an initial £85, plus £3.10 per pupil. Assuming each of those schools has just one reception class of 30 pupils, the DfE’s paybill to Early Excellence will be more than £2.1 million.

 



Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

6 Comments

  1. Colin Alston

    Hilarious but utterly predictable. Even when there was one uniform Baseline Assessment scheme, some years ago, absolutely nobody (including top LA stats folk, OFsted’s finest, DfES’s best number people) nobody could link its statistical outcomes with individual children’s later KS1 results, let alone KS2. There is no viable progress measure for any Baseline Assessment scheme, because (i) all Baseline judgements are subjective (ii) the assessments are not ‘culture-fair’; and (iii) if primary schools are to be Ofsted-judged on their measured progress over time, they will ensure shit-low assessment figures at Baseline.

    • June Mallott

      I am afraid our education system is becoming a laughing stock and I am relieved to be almost at the end of my teaching career-just sorry my grandchildrens futures are at the mercy of these ridiculous measurers.

  2. I worry about testing testing testing. Even this school readiness test seems to suggest testing if children can read simple words etc. When will they let children be children. Test if they are happy, sociable, able to listen to a short story, put their own coat on, cut along a line etc. Stop pressurising them pre school to do things they’re not ready for. I worry about the type of teachers that will come through this current climate. Children still need fun at school

  3. Lisa Kovacs

    (Sorry about the glitch in my comment)
    School readiness does not mean being able to hold a pencil correctly and read a few words! I thought Personal and Social skills, Communication and Language and Physical Development were the Prime Areas in the EYFS. Children need to be able to speak and listen before they can read and write. Please look to Pasi Sandberg’s Finnish Lessons! We have got it so wrong in this country.
    (PS I have taught Infants for 20 years.)

    • Carol Wood

      I quite agree. If the government just listened they would find out so much more about how children learn – if they looked at their own EYFS document it would surely help too! Obviously its more than 3 years old so needs remodelling!

  4. Jane Holcroft

    The irony is that no matter how much you test some children are never going to be school ready because of their age, background or previous life experiences. I have been teching for 20 years and this is not new. Children are all individuals and are ready when they are ready! We as practitioners can give them the input, experiences and encouragement but only as individuals. All children can succeed in their own way but they will do it in their own sweet time no matter hiw many boxes we tick. The government just needs to butt out of Education and let us teach, politicuNs wouldnt last 5 minutes in my reception class, they have no idea what they are talking about. Please just let teachers teach – we are certainly not doing it for the money!