News

EXCLUSIVE: Elite private schools named in damning inspection file



A damning dossier of previously unpublished improvement notices has revealed substantial failings at some of the country’s most prestigious independent schools.

Since July last year, 110 private schools have been handed statutory improvement notices by the Department for Education (DfE).

Ofsted guidance states the notices are issued when there has been a “substantial number of regulatory failures” and schools can be closed if they fail to act.

Documents obtained by Schools Week show private schools have breached the minimum independent school regulations 410 times over the past 16 months.

They include the highly coveted Royal Ballet School in London, billed as “one of the world’s greatest centres of classical ballet training”, and the £14,000-a-year Hill House School, once attended by Prince Charles.

Others ordered to improve include the Sylvia Young Theatre School in west London, which counts Amy Winehouse and Rita Ora among its alumni, and international boarding school Newbury Hall, which charges £35,000 a year.

The notices are not routinely published by the government, but were obtained by Schools Week and the Yorkshire Post as part of a joint investigation.

Melissa Benn, founder of the Local Schools Network charity, said the findings challenged the assumption that “independent schools have everything to teach the hard-pressed public sector”.

The information, released under freedom of information laws, should be systematically “available to all”, she said. “It does no one any favours – be it the pupils, parents, the school or the wider public – if problems can be concealed from public view. Transparency is an important principle.”

The Royal Ballet School, based in Covent Garden, central London, and a Grade I listed Georgian house in Richmond Park, west London, was issued a notice in November
last year.

An earlier Ofsted inspection found pupil safeguarding was “not effective” and the system for vetting staff was “liable to error”.

Hill House, based in Knightsbridge, central London, received two notices, in March and October this year, for a total of nine breaches.

In one notice the school was told it must meet requirements to provide suitable showers and outdoor space.

An inspection report published in March also criticised the school for breaching health and safety measures and said children were not making adequate progress in maths and writing. Both schools did not respond to requests for comment.

The Sylvia Young Theatre School, based in Marylebone, west London, which charges up to £4,500 per term, was told it did not meet child protection requirements.

Sylvia Young, the founder, told Schools Week the notice related to a small number of staff not having a second reference and medical declaration.

She said a no-notice inspection in May found the school now met standards.

Queen Ethelburga’s College, in North Yorkshire, was handed a notice in July following concerns about the use of 700 CCTV cameras on the school site in an earlier inspection.

Headmaster Stephen Jandrell told the Yorkshire Post all points raised in the report were “fully attended to”.

Newbury Hall, based in Berkshire, was pulled up for inappropriately lit, heated and ventilated accommodation.

Principal Jon Crocker said the school did not agree with large parts of the notice.

Our findings follow Ofsted’s revelation last month that nearly four in five religious independent schools formerly inspected by the discredited Bridge Schools Inspectorate had been rated again and found to be inadequate or requires improvement.

One of those schools, Covenant Christian School, in Stockport, was issued a notice last month after failing to meet seven separate regulations – the highest of any school in our findings – and Ofsted said pupils were not safe.

But headteacher Dr Roger Slack said he felt harshly treated by the education watchdog, and most breaches were paperwork issues related to failing to follow “Ofsted methods”.

He said the school had an excellent safeguarding record, and had since implemented most of its action plan to improve.

Analysis of the improvement notices shows schools failed to meet minimum standards for pupil welfare, health and safety on 113 occasions.

There were 58 breaches for premises and accommodation regulations and another 56 for the quality of leadership and management.

F2

A spokesperson for the Independent Schools Council, which represents fewer than 20 schools on the list, said: “Most of our schools get these things right and those who don’t should work quickly to make sure that they do.”

The spokesperson said schools were rightly held to high standards, and while some reports highlighted serious breaches, many schools failed because of administrative processes.

A headteacher of one of the schools on the list, who did not want to be named, told Schools Week state sector colleagues “now stare in disbelief at the volume of our compliance-related documentation compared to theirs”.

A DfE spokesperson said: “All independent schools must comply with the Independent School Standards, and where there are concerns a school is failing to meet these standards, we will take swift action.”

Additional reporting by Billy Camden



Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2 Comments

  1. Ben Bazzard

    Although this had the potential to be an interesting article, the quality of the journalistic skills is very low. It reeks of tabloid sensationalism, more focused on celebrity name-dropping and private school shaming than offering the reader any insight into these inspections.
    The lack of context is particularly disappointing, on two fronts. Firstly, it is made clear that 110 private schools have been handed improvement notices but there is no mention of how many private schools were deemed satisfactory or exceeded the expected regulations. Nor is there any mention of how this compares from schools in the state sector. Secondly, although there is a very small amount of information about the regulations which have been assessed, there is no mention of the changing nature of these regulations over the last decade (rising, as I understand it, from fewer than a dozen to a few hundred).
    Furthermore, it is a legal requirement for all schools to ensure that the details of any inspection are publicly available. This may be a direct link on their website or by request to the headmaster. The claim that it has taken a joint investigation between this publication and the Yorkshire Post to reveal information which is legally required to be accessible to the public is therefore misleading at best.
    Indeed even the headline is flawed; the word elite should be used to define a school which is superior in quality to others, not as the article suggests, a school which boasts famous alumni or charges fees.
    I may be unfairly expecting higher standards of journalism from schoolsweek, this may well be an article of the standard to which the editors aspire. However, it seems to me that John Dickens, the author of this article, has fallen well short of the schoolsweek statement proclaiming to be ‘in-depth, investigative education journalism, determined to get past the bluster and explain the facts’.

    • Laura McInerney

      Context is difficult here because the two types of inspection and failures are not synonymous.
      There are approximately 2,600 independent schools in England. The rate is therefore around 4% over 14 months. In state-funded schools the rate of ‘inadequates’ is around 7%, but they are not comparable as the two inspections work on very different premises. The independent school standards are pass/fail, whereas those in state schools are (largely) broader judgments of quality.
      Any context we could have given in the piece would therefore have been spurious. These two types of inspection stand on their own and are therefore not compared because we would have been adding in an unnecessary variable. This goes back to our value of getting past bluster in stories, but I am always more than happy to further explain our thinking.

      The inspection reports are theoretically publicly available, although we found on several occasions the reports were not available on websites. The notices handed from government have not previously been released to the public before and in our initial investigations we were told they were “private letters”. It was only our determined use of the freedom of information act that secured their release.
      Obviously the reports and notices are available by request – as we received them by request! The point made by Melissa Benn is that they are not systematically available and published in the same way that warning notices are when sent from the government to academies.
      The world elite is defined as “a select group that is superior in terms of ability or qualities to the rest of a group or society”. Schools such as the Royal Ballet School and Sylvia Young, named in the story and the file, are undoubtedly elite.

      In terms of “insights into these inspections” – we have explained what they are, head teacher views on them, and given space to the ISC view. We’ve analysed and completed a graphic of typically types of failings and how many normally occur. You may find the celebrity aspect to be sensationalist; in our view it is contextual.