Opinion

Change management lessons for education policy makers

24 Oct 2019, 9:22



As our system continues to struggle to improve the achievement of learners from poorer backgrounds, Mel Ainscow argues the ‘what works’ mantra is symptomatic of a failure to grasp the complexities of change management

This month, another school in England has been rapped for off-rolling in the full knowledge, and with the support, of its local authority. Days later, Ofsted’s first batch of new reports revealed criticism of ‘3-year GCSEs’ and low EBacc entries, as if both of these things could be reconciled without marginalising a raft of vulnerable learners.

Part of the problem is the failure to deal with the systemic issues in a sustainable and systematic way. Another is that the conception of research that underpins the ‘evidence-informed’ policy drive typifies those systemic issues.

In our new book, to be published in November, Christopher Chapman, Mark Hadfield and I analysed efforts to use research within three large-scale education improvement projects: City Challenge in England, Schools Challenge Cymru in Wales and the Scottish Attainment Challenge. The experiences that informed Changing education systems: a research-based approach led to a number of lessons system leaders of all persuasions ought to heed.

First, there is usually more expertise within an education system than is used. Where we witnessed success, it was through moving this knowledge around – amongst teachers and between schools.

Second, a host of barriers make it difficult to maintain such collaborative approaches. This often results from existing ways of working, which, although well intended, consume time and resources, and delay action in the field.

A secondary headteacher described the problem thus: School improvement, he said, is like trying to drive more quickly down a road with speed bumps every few yards. These ‘bumps’ include pressures placed on schools – particularly those facing challenging circumstances – that have a tendency to demoralise the very agents of change: the staff in schools.

There is usually more expertise within an education system than is used

Some barriers are political. The most striking evidence of this occurred following national elections in two of the countries. New ministers immediately resulted in the Challenge projects losing much of their political mandate. Though projects did continue, they did so with less power to make things happen.

Further barriers resulted from different views on priorities and timescales for change. While government officials were primarily concerned with rapid impact on examination results, intervention leaders’ preoccupation tended to be with longer-term, sustainable change.

Some of our involvement was in contexts characterised by high levels of cooperation. Surprisingly, this can also create social barriers, such as where tightly knit educational communities can be both supportive and, at the same time, restrictive. So much so, that it can sometimes lead to a reluctance amongst practitioners to share their ideas and discuss their worries. A primary head commented, ‘We don’t bare our souls round here’.

With all of this in mind, we propose a way of thinking about system change that seeks to move knowledge around. Since effective change requires coordinated efforts at all levels of education systems, this has implications for all the key stakeholders.

In particular, it require teachers – especially those in senior positions – to see themselves as having a wider responsibility for all children and young people, not just those that attend their own schools.

It means too that policy makers must recognise that the contextual specifics of policy implementation are not amenable to central regulation.  Rather, these should be dealt with by those who are close to the local contexts where policy must be turned into practice.

Our study of system change and educational reform is a robust challenge to the current fashion for the ‘what works’ approach. Practitioners are hobbled if they are there only to adopt practices designed and evaluated by researchers.

What is needed instead is an approach rooted in change management. Teachers and school leaders must be more than ‘deliverers’ of the ideas of others. Only professionals, trusted to develop practices in context, can form the bridge between policy and research on one hand, and sustainable, equitable outcomes on the other.



Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2 Comments

  1. There is much good stuff in this article but disappointing to see no mention of the role of ‘proper’ school councils. This article explains our journey in my headship school to overcoming the challenges of a very poor inner-urban catchment in a northern town.

    https://rogertitcombelearningmatters.wordpress.com/2016/04/20/school-councils-misunderstandings-misuse-and-missed-opportunities-for-learning-excellence/

    Here is an extract

    What did our School Council achieve? Through its role in implementing the ‘Equal Opportunities Policy’ it transformed the entire culture of the school. The anti-bullying work was key. The issues related to the current controversy over sexual harassment of female students were well understood and addressed. Only the internet dimension is new. Such problems have always existed. Our own daughters suffered in the 1980s in their Leicestershire comprehensive schools.

    School Council members and officers gained confidence, articulacy and personal skills of lifelong value and this informed and elevated the entire student and staff culture of the school. Such was our success that it became nationally recognised and our School Council Officers were invited to explain our approach through an address to MPs in the House of Commons in 1993 and again in 1995.

    A very important effect on school culture related to how our more and less able students were perceived by their peers. Comprehensive schools are often accused of not protecting able, hard working students from bullying and attacks on their confidence and esteem from less able peers. Our most able School Council members and officers readily gained respect and esteem from peers through being able to independently demonstrate their accomplishments in public speaking, managing meetings, conflict resolution intervention and general wisdom and good sense.

    The School Council was absolutely mixed ability in nature. Many students that received support in our SEN department, including a number with SEN Statements, were heavily involved. This gave our less academically accomplished pupils the confidence to become engaged resulting in some astonishing transformations as it was perceived that mature good sense and wisdom could be developed and demonstrated by everybody. I could give examples of many cases of the latter, but will not, for fear of identifying individuals in their current adult lives in what remains a close-knit community.

  2. A good article. School improvement is a long term haul that requires resources, time and money over a long period of time. Difficult if the curriculum is changing with a new specification every other year. End of the day it is the teachers doing the job day in day out that need most of the support but in my case get very little. Difficult to do on a full timetable with form tutor role, duties and everything else that the teacher is expected to do.